Aeroelasticity & Structural Dynamics in a Fast Changing World
17 – 21 June 2024, The Hague, The Netherlands
Home Program Author Index Search

Flexible aircraft conceptual co-design based on the RCE framework


Go-down ifasd2024 Tracking Number 99

Presentation:
Session: Aeroelastic design 1
Room: Room 1.2
Session start: 16:00 Tue 18 Jun 2024

Béla Takarics   takarics.bela@sztaki.hun-ren.hu
Affifliation: HUN-REN Institute for Computer Science and Control

Bálint Patarics   patartics.balint@sztaki.hun-ren.hu
Affifliation: HUN-REN Institute for Computer Science and Control

Bálint Vanek   vanek.balint@sztaki.hun-ren.hu
Affifliation: HUN-REN Institute for Computer Science and Control

Fanglin Yu   fanglin.yu@tum.de
Affifliation: Technical University of Munich

Yasser M. Meddaikar   Muhammad.Meddaikar@dlr.de
Affifliation: DLR - Institute of Aeroelasticity

Matthias Wuestenhagen   Matthias.Wuestenhagen@dlr.de
Affifliation: DLR - Institute of System Dynamics and Control

Thiemo Kier   Thiemo.Kier@dlr.de
Affifliation: DLR - Institute of System Dynamics and Control


Topics: - Reduced Order Modeling (High and low fidelity (un)coupled analysis methods:), - Aeroelasticity in Conceptual Aircraft Design (Vehicle analysis/design using model-based and data driven models), - Aeroservoelasticity (Vehicle analysis/design using model-based and data driven models), - Active Control and Adaptive Structures (Vehicle analysis/design using model-based and data driven models)

Abstract:

In a traditional aircraft design process, the airframe is designed first, followed by synthesizing the control system. This sequential method does not guarantee the best possible closed-loop performance. The goal of the paper is to propose automatic control design methods for flexible aircraft. Such approach enables the inclusion of the control design algorithms into the multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) of aircraft design. In such an extended MDO framework, called co-design, the sizing, structural dynamics, aerodynamics and the controllers of the aircraft are optimized in one single step. Co-design allows the usage of control technologies early in the conceptual preliminary design stage of aircraft design. A demonstrator aircraft T-Flex serves as a test bed for the conceptual co-design. DLR’s Remote Component Environment (RCE) framework is used as the backbone for the MDO toolchain implementation. The control design algorithms of the co-design considered in the paper are the baseline and the flutter suppression controllers, which require a control oriented aeroservoelastic model. The modeling is done via the bottom-up modelling approach and the resulting control oriented models are given in the linear parameter-varying (LPV) framework. The baseline control system features a classical cascade flight control structure with scheduled control loops to augment the lateral and longitudinal axis of the aircraft. The control loops use scheduled elements of proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller structures. The flutter controller aims to mitigate the undamped oscillations of the wings that occur if the aircraft is flying beyond the flutter speed. Parametric and dynamic uncertainties are accounted for in the control design. The objective of the design is to minimize the sensitivity function of the closed-loop while limiting the bandwidth of the controller to prevent the excitation of high-frequency dynamics. The effect of the following parameters on the conceptual co-design is investigated: wing sweep angle between 0 and 30 degrees, flutter mass between 0 and 0.4 kg and ply angle between -45 and 45 degrees. It is examined how these parameters affect the flutter modes of the aircraft and the performances of the baseline and flutter suppression controllers and the results can be used for conceptual aircraft design.