Aeroelasticity & Structural Dynamics in a Fast Changing World
17 – 21 June 2024, The Hague, The Netherlands
Home Program Author Index Search

Flexible aircraft flight dynamics and loads model identification from flight test data in unsteady conditions


Go-down ifasd2024 Tracking Number 198

Presentation:
Session: Aeroelastic testing 2
Room: Room 1.2
Session start: 13:30 Tue 18 Jun 2024

Andres Jurisson   Andres.Jurisson@nlr.nl
Affifliation: Netherlands Aerospace Centre

Bart Eussen   Bart.Eussen@nlr.nl
Affifliation: Netherlands Aerospace Centre

Coen de Visser   c.c.devisser@tudelft.nl
Affifliation: Delft University of Technology

Roeland de Breuker   R.DeBreuker@tudelft.nl
Affifliation: Delft University of Technology


Topics: - Aeroservoelasticity (Vehicle analysis/design using model-based and data driven models), - Wind Tunnel and Flight Testing (Experimental methods)

Abstract:

This paper presents a method for identifying flight dynamics models for aircraft that includes effects from the flexible structure and the effects from unsteady aerodynamics. In the time domain, the unsteady aerodynamic effects are often modelled using aerodynamic lag states. The proposed method involves first determining the poles that govern the dynamics for these lag states from flight data. This is followed by reconstructing the time signal histories for these lag states so that they can then be used as part of the model fitting procedure. Flight tests were conducted using a scaled Diana2 glider unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in order to collect experimental data for modelling. To be able to measure the response of the aircraft and its structure, the glider was instrumented with a wide range of sensors including accelerometers, gyroscopes and strain gauges placed across the aircraft structure. During the flight, various excitation manoeuvres were conducted by the pilot while the aircraft responses were collected. From these measurements, a full flight dynamics model consisting of both lateral and longitudinal dynamics was then identified. Additionally, a model predicting the tail and wing root loads was also identified. First, a rigid aircraft model was fitted that was then extended with states corresponding to the flexible modes and aerodynamic lags. Comparison between the rigid and extended model showed that the addition of structural modes and aerodynamic lag states to the identified models can lead up to 30% improvement in predicting aircraft responses. In conclusion, the method developed and presented in this paper is able to identify flight dynamics models from flight data that more accurately capture the dynamics of flexible aircraft by including effects from the flexible structure and unsteady aerodynamics.